Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Soil organic carbon (SOC) represents the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Effectively monitoring SOC at high spatial resolution is crucial for estimating carbon budgets at the ecosystem scale and informing climate change mitigation efforts at the regional scale. Traditional soil sampling methods, however, are laborious and expensive. Remote sensing platforms can be used to survey large landscapes to meet the need for rapid and cost-effective approaches for quantifying SOC at landscape to regional scales, if relationships between remotely sensed variables and SOC can be established. We developed a workflow to analyze and predict SOC content based on National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) Airborne Observation Platform (AOP) remote sensing data. First, we benchmarked related tools and developed reproducible workflows using NEON remote sensing datasets. Hyperspectral data were extracted from the locations where NEON soil data exist. Additional variables from the LiDAR data and key metadata (climate and land cover) were extracted for those locations. Random Forest and Partial Least Squares Regression techniques were then used to create models for fine-scale SOC prediction. Cross-validation was embedded in the model creation step. The most important covariates were selected through recursive feature elimination, stepwise selection, and expert judgment. Preliminary results indicate that machine learning models can re-produce SOC measurements in testing datasets. Key predictors include topographic variables, vegetation indices, and specific wavelength bands in hyperspectral images. We are further validating our algorithms using SOC data from ISCN (International Soil Carbon Network) and SoDaH (SOils DAta Harmonization database) that are co-located with NEON sites. We are creating high-resolution SOC maps for 0-30 cm depth at NEON sites and testing our algorithms for different land use types. Our work paves the way for a broader assessment of SOC stocks using remote sensing observations, and our high-resolution SOC maps will potentially help quantify carbon budgets across heterogeneous landscapes.more » « less
-
Abstract Tidal wetlands provide valuable ecosystem services, including storing large amounts of carbon. However, the net exchanges of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) in tidal wetlands are highly uncertain. While several biogeochemical models can operate in tidal wetlands, they have yet to be parameterized and validated against high‐frequency, ecosystem‐scale CO2and CH4flux measurements across diverse sites. We paired the Cohort Marsh Equilibrium Model (CMEM) with a version of the PEPRMT model called PEPRMT‐Tidal, which considers the effects of water table height, sulfate, and nitrate availability on CO2and CH4emissions. Using a model‐data fusion approach, we parameterized the model with three sites and validated it with two independent sites, with representation from the three marine coasts of North America. Gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) modules explained, on average, 73% of the variation in CO2exchange with low model error (normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) <1). The CH4module also explained the majority of variance in CH4emissions in validation sites (R2 = 0.54; nRMSE = 1.15). The PEPRMT‐Tidal‐CMEM model coupling is a key advance toward constraining estimates of greenhouse gas emissions across diverse North American tidal wetlands. Further analyses of model error and case studies during changing salinity conditions guide future modeling efforts regarding four main processes: (a) the influence of salinity and nitrate on GPP, (b) the influence of laterally transported dissolved inorganic C on Reco, (c) heterogeneous sulfate availability and methylotrophic methanogenesis impacts on surface CH4emissions, and (d) CH4responses to non‐periodic changes in salinity.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

Full Text Available